NEW LRT 200-3 LTC Core Exchange Assembly
Normandy Machine Company offers options in managing and maintaining critical Power Transformer Assets by extending the life of Load Tap Changers in offering LTC Core Exchange Services and Field Service Kits. Re-manufactured LTC Assemblies are available, many IN STOCK, for immediate Exchange.
Utilizing 21st Century machining and materials technology deliver higher quality assemblies and components which deliver higher quality performance. Increased RELIABILITY maximizes your Asset Management performance allowing you to meet or exceed your Company’s Asset Management goals.
Your Power Transformers will now meet or exceed RELIABILITY and PERFORMANCE expectations. NMC removes the LTC as the “weak link”. NMC Field Supervisory experts are available to assist your personnel in transitioning your LTC Core Exchange or Field Service Kit while providing much needed Field Training for your Station Technicians and Mechanics.
The value of Maintenance is always questioned. Fundamentally, though, it reflects the quality of an organization, their commitment to employee safety and overall operational integrity.
EMPLOYEE SAFETY – general industry and commercial compliance issues required for your employees to understand electrical safety and are trained in electrical safety procedures, methodologies and proper use of all related equipment up to the most current Industry requirements. If these tasks are documented as part of an ongoing Maintenance and Safety Program; Owners, Management, Facility Managers or Plant Managers can be relatively assured that they are in compliance with applicable NFPA 70B and OSHA 29CFR1910 regulations.
PRODUCTION – The underlying facts relative to achieving and maintaining minimum Operations reliability and productivity are typically required from your Company’s management, owners and stakeholders.
If an incident were to occur with the electrical distribution system at an Industrial or Manufacturing facility resulting in a recordable OSHA accident, the aforementioned regulations will be referred to in determining the levying of any penalties, fines, litigation or any other actionable items recommended moving forward.
Manufacturers do not warranty their equipment over (1) year. Any implied performance or lack thereof will refer back to the Manufacturers Operating & Instruction manuals which will clearly state that beyond the standard (1) Year Warranty, the manufacturer’s require testing and maintenance to be performed on the equipment at recommended intervals (typically annually).
Performing and documenting regularly scheduled:
- Testing and Maintenance on your Plant’s electrical distribution system
- Conducting electrical safe practices for your Plant’s Operating and Maintenance personnel
Reference documents: NFPA 70B; 70E and OSHA 29CFR1910
New developments include NFPA 70E-2014 Arc Flash requirements. This requires equipment Labeling, proper PPE and Training of Plant personnel. It begins with an accurate One-Line Diagram. To accomplish this, the Data Gathering can be performed during Maintenance (this will verify existing One-Line or allow the composition of an accurate One-Line). Subsequent Engineering Study calculations are performed which generate the Labeling. Finally, the purchase of the PPE determined by the Study should be purchased for Plant personnel and Training in the proper use thereof, then is performed.
Mark S. McCloy monkey_power
Standard for Shielded Power Cable Diagnostic Testing Methodologies
The advancement and evolution of the development and use of Partial Discharge as the technology to monitor and alarm the insulation integrity of both electrical power apparatus, accessories and the entire power systems’ Assets continues to gain credibility, accuracy and reliability. The ability to monitor an Owner’s Assets of this significance; continuously, without outage interruption has enormous value – is self-evident.
The most cost-effective applications continue to be power transformers, Iso-Phase Bus and all rotating equipment – and most applicable accessories. Regarding shielded power cable, though, the most practical, pragmatic approach for this application is the use of off-line, Tan Delta Diagnostics, Withstand or the very popular combination – Monitored Withstand Field Tests, which achieve significant, objective and reliable results that have proven to deliver real value to the Owners of significant power cable Assets.
For purposes of efficiency; we will address the application of shielded, solid-dielectric insulated power cable through 38KV; underground residential, network, bus-tie, station get-away, overhead, direct bury and associated applications. Additionally, we will only address Tan-Delta (Dissipation Factor and related Power Factor) and Partial Discharge technologies. There are other methods outlined in IEEE Std 400-2012; Std 400.2-2013; Std 400.3-2006 which we will use as the guide basis of this paper. Diagnostic Testing can be defined as Non-Destructive, meaning it does not induce undetected defects in a defect-free cable system and does not intentionally cause a failure during the test. A destructive test is defined as a test which (a) requires that a defect produce a fault during the test, and/or (b) produce substantial cable system degradation which goes undetected during the test.
Diagnostic Testing of high voltage electrical power equipment and conductor can be divided into two categories. On-Line (or energized) and commonly referred to as Level 1 (non-invasive; on-line) Diagnostics and Off-Line (de-energized); both methodologies require experienced, trained personnel in Safe electrical practices within a high voltage environment.
Partial discharge diagnostic testing has proven to be effective as a permanent, on-line monitoring technology in switchgear, bus and transformer applications; utilization of RFI bandwidth allows for an overall “umbrella” or pre-locating application as a system. Additionally, the use of portable, Level 1 Diagnostic PD detection for large, power transformers, lightening arrestors and rotating equipment is developing into a reliable methodology and technology, as directed by the pre-locate of the RFI signatures. Both permanent and portable Level 1 applications are beginning to establish objective, known recorded values over many years of use and many test subjects; with the resulting reliable, useful operational diagnostic information as the goal; unfortunately, there remains contention regarding detailed, objective diagnostic PD levels generated by the installed Cable System and most notably the Accessories. Off-Line PD will not measure any water-tree defects, only Splices and Terminations (Accessories).
Cable application of On-Line PD measures and records noise along the length of the conductor, allowing identification of “where in the cable length” the appreciable discharges are located. Tan-Delta (Dissipation Factor) measures and records the tangent angle of the entire cable length (test specimen).
Tan Delta Testing for Shielded Power Cable – What Is Tan δ, Or Tan Delta?
Tan Delta, also called Loss Angle or Dissipation Factor testing, is a diagnostic method of testing cables to determine the quality of the cable insulation. This is done to try to predict the remaining life expectancy and, in order to prioritize cable replacement and/or injection. It is also useful for determining what other tests may be worthwhile.
How Does It Work?
If the insulation of a cable is free from defects, like water trees, electrical trees, moisture and air pockets, etc., the cable approaches the properties of a perfect capacitor. It is very similar to a parallel plate capacitor with the conductor and the neutral being the two plates separated by the insulation material.
In a perfect capacitor, the voltage and current are phase shifted 90 degrees and the current through the insulation is capacitive. If there are impurities in the insulation, like those mentioned above, the resistance of the insulation decreases, resulting in an increase in resistive current through the insulation. It is no longer a perfect capacitor. The current and voltage will no longer be shifted 90 degrees. It will be something less than 90 degrees. The extent to which the phase shift is less than 90 degrees is indicative of the level of insulation contamination, hence quality/reliability. This “Loss Angle” is measured and analyzed. Below is a representation of a cable. The tangent of the angle δ is measured. This will indicate the level of resistance in the insulation. By measuring IR/IC (opposite over adjacent – the tangent), we can determine the quality of the cable insulation. In a perfect cable, the angle would be nearly zero. An increasing angle indicates an increase in the resistive current through the insulation, meaning contamination. The greater the angle, the worse the cable, as a system.
Doble Power Factor: CABLES AND POTHEADS
The overall power-factor test for cable insulation is confined largely to lengths of cable that come within the current limits of the Doble test set being used; however, regardless of the length of cable, Hot-Collar tests may be applied to all types of potheads.
Tabulations of power-factor data for cables are provided in the Cables and Accessories Section of the Doble Power Factor Test-Data Reference Book; valuable additional information is included in the Doble Reference Book on Cables and Accessories and in Doble Conference Minutes (refer to Indexes of Minutes). Some typical power-factor data for common cable-insulation systems is as follows:
||0.5 to 1.0% @ 20°C
||0.05 to 0.10% @ 20°C
||0.50 to 1.0% @ 20°C
|Rubber (and Kerite)
||3.0 to 5.0% @20°C
||4.0 to 8.0% @ 20
Note: Modern cable has a relatively flat power-factor versus temperature relation. The power factor of old cables made around 1920-1930 may increase more rapidly with increase in temperature.
TAN DELTA MEASUREMENT GRAPHIC DISPLAY
VLF WITHSTAND ONLY
TAN DELTA BRIDGE in Series w/ VLF
Cables which do not have a metallic sheath or grounded shield but are installed in metallic conduit may have power factors somewhat higher than the values listed above and in the Doble Power-Factor Test-Data Reference Book.
Cables which do not have a metallic sheath or grounded shield and are installed in fiber or other forms of nonmetallic conduit may have normal power factors considerably higher than the values listed above because of the poor dielectric circuit to ground. Grounding adjacent cables will improve the dielectric circuit when testing cables of this type. Ungrounded-specimen tests between unshielded cables in the same conduit may be used to confine the test primarily to the cable insulation, excluding the duct material.
Tests performed with either the 2.5- or 10-kV Doble test sets will usually detect the presence of moisture in the cable insulation; however, multi-voltage tests (at least up to the line-to-neutral voltage) should be performed. “Tip-up” in power factor with increase in test potential is indicative of losses due to ionization. In general, cable that has a power factor noticeably above that of similar-type cables or an appreciable “tip-up” in power factor should be investigated for moisture and/or corona deterioration.
Results of the Hot-Collar tests (loss/current) are graded largely by comparison of data taken on similar type potheads. Abnormally high dielectric loss and current usually indicate the presence of moisture. Increases in losses with increased test potential indicate the presence of voids. Below-normal test currents indicate the absence of compound or oil.
Partial Discharge Testing for Shielded Power Cable
Partial Discharge (PD) is a localized dielectric breakdown of a small portion of a solid or liquid electrical insulation system under high voltage stress. While a corona discharge is usually revealed by a relatively steady glow or brush discharge in air, partial discharges within an insulation system may or may not exhibit visible discharges, and discharge events tend to be more sporadic in nature than corona discharges.
A partial discharge is an electrical discharge (formation of a streamer or arc) that does not bridge the entire space between two electrodes. The discharge may occur in a gas-filled void within the extruded cable insulation, at the interface between a shield protrusion and the insulation, at a shield skip, at the boundaries of a contaminant, or at the tip of a well-developed water tree when a cable is subjected to moderately high voltage. Partial discharges can also occur in a cable termination, in a joint, in air, or within a cable.
Partial discharge tests. There are several methods for detecting and measuring PD. Some methods involve de-energizing, disconnecting, and powering the cable from a special voltage source, while other methods allow the cable to remain energized at normal line voltage. Both methods will detect and measure partial discharge in Pico Coulombs (PC). The authors of the IEEE study on water trees state that electrical trees will likely progress to failure quickly, so PD testing would be more valuable if performed in conjunction with dissipation factor/power factor (DF/PF) testing. We will address On-Line Partial Discharge Diagnostic Testing only.
Of course, all Field Testing can be influenced by elevation, temperature and humidity.
Proper Asset Management should always employ trending over time of the Test activity.
The following IEEE Paper (significant NEETRAC influence) explains concisely.
Interpretation of dielectric loss data on service aged polyethylene based power cable systems using VLF test methods
The more targeted approach requires an assessment of the health of cable systems. It is increasingly common for the assessment of aged cable systems to be made through the application of diagnostic measurements. A recent study has shown that Very Low Frequency (VLF) Tan δ is the most commonly deployed cable system diagnostic. The practical use of this technique has been supported by the international standards IEEE Std. 400-2001 and IEEE Std. 400.2-2004. A key part of these standards is the guidance provided to a user that is detailed in the “Figures of Merit”.
These enable users to identify cable systems that are more likely to fail in service near term. To aid these decisions a series of criteria have been developed. The benefit of the criteria described here is that the process for their determination is rational, reproducible, and transparent. The outcomes are supported by a probabilistic assessment of service performance.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation (Volume: 20, Issue: 5, Oct. 2013) Page(s): 1699 – 1711 Date of Publication: 21 October 2013
Print ISSN: 1070-9878 ; INSPEC Accession Number: 13849660
Publisher: IEEE; Sponsored by: IEEE Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation Society
References and Bibliography
IEEE Std 400-2012; Std 400.2-2013; Std 400.3-2006
IEEE Power Engineering Society; NEETRAC
EC&M Oct 2003
NETA World 2006
High Voltage Inc.
Solar installations double over 2015 levels with non-residential Utility and Independent Power Producers outpacing Residential for the first time since 2011. 40 GW is on-line. What are the availability percentages of Wind? What would the Residential installation levels be WITHOUT the $3,000. Federal Tax Credit?
Feb 15 (Renewables Now) – The US has installed 14,625 MW of solar photovoltaic (PV) capacity in 2016, nearly doubling its previous annual record of 7,493 MW set in 2015, GTM Research and the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) said today.
With a 95% year-on-year growth of the solar market, solar power became the number one source of new electric generating capacity additions annually, accounting for 39% of new installations across all fuel types.
The US now has over 1.3 million solar PV installations with a cumulative capacity exceeding 40 GW. This data comes from GTM Research and SEIA’s latest US Solar Market Insight report, which will be release on March 9, 2017.
The utility-scale segment grew 145% on the year, which is the highest growth rate of any segment, according to the report.
“While US solar grew across all segments, what stands out is the double digit gigawatt boom in utility-scale solar, primarily due to solar’s cost competitiveness with natural gas alternatives,” said
Cory Honeyman, GTM Research’s associate director of US solar research. He noted that a record 22 states each deployed over 100 MW throughout the year.
At the same time, non-residential installation growth surpassed that of the residential solar segment for the first time since 2011, even though residential solar added a “still-impressive” 2,583 MW for a 19% year-on-year hike.
The non-residential market, in turn, expanded thanks to a record total of over 200 MW of community solar, and a rush in project development and installation growth across several major states, most notably in California.
A precious Letter to a senior policy manager at Scotland Renewables is worth the read.
WHEREAS I accept that Lindsay Roberts, senior policy manager at Scottish Renewables, is just doing her job by peddling the myth that “power supplied by renewable energy technologies reduces the need for power from other sources, thereby reducing fossil fuel consumption and harmful emissions” (Letters, February 8), there is no credible evidence to support her assertion. There is, however, plenty of evidence to the contrary that supports my statement that renewable technologies are in fact adding to CO2 emissions.
A recent report by the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) stated: “Renewable electricity generation was 83.3 TWh in 2015, an increase of 28.9 per cent on the 64.7 TWh in 2014, with bioenergy up by 27.8 per cent and wind generation up 26.4 per cent. Renewables’ share of electricity generation was a record 24.7 per cent in 2015, an increase of 5.6 percentage points on the 19.1 per cent in 2014. Renewable electricity capacity was 30.0 GW at the end of 2015, a 21.9 per cent increase (5.4 GW) on a year earlier”.
Although the above is probably music to Ms Roberts’s ears, however, there is another report from BEIS that clearly shows that CO2 emissions from burning natural gas, in the main, have gone up by 3.7 per cent, despite an increase of 28.9 per cent to 83.3TWh in electricity generation in 2015: “Final energy consumption increased by 2,291 ktoe (1.7 per cent) in 2015 to 137,430 ktoe. The majority of the increase was due to gas which increased by 1,481 ktoe (3.7 per cent). The domestic sector saw the biggest increase in both absolute and percentage terms; by 1,391 ktoe (3.6 per cent)”.
Unfortunately for planet Earth, we have wasted the last 40 years generating junk electricity from wind, waves and tides that merely delays the inevitable burning of our dwindling supplies of fossil fuels for a few hours at best, but does not stop it from being burned. Burning woody biomass instead of coal to raise steam increases CO2 emissions by up to 25 per cent and cutting down healthy trees that put back two oxygen atoms into the atmosphere from every CO2 molecule by photosynthesis makes it the stupidest “renewable energy” scheme ever devised.
We must accept renewables that convert wind, waves and tides into tiny pulses of pretty worthless electricity is a failed experiment and we must move on to a brave new world where renewable electricity is delivered non-intermittently 24-7 without burning anything at all. Nobody knows when our planet’s reserves of coal, gas and oil will run out, but a good start would be for governments to stop paying subsidies for junk electricity that requires fossil fuels to back it up.
President Trump may well be the first to do so!
Andrew H Mackay,
Causewayside, Glenaldie, Tain.